Listening for a future for Eastern North Carolina Churches
In the South Roanoke Baptist Association we have been doing a process we call DARTS. Discovering Associational Realities Through Spiritual Journeys. We have taken the journey of prayer, the journey of Bible study, the journey of intensive and extensive self reflection among our churches. We are now on the journey of pulling together what it all means to see if we can hear God speaking to us. We are about half way through that pulling together journey and I can say that I do believe that God is speaking to us and that He is laying out a fresh vision and mission for the churches of the South Roanoke Baptist Association.
Here are some of the conclusions that we began to see in the first part of the listening journey.
1. None of the New Testament Churches ever worked alone, they were all part of the larger body. The local church is not the Kingdom of God, it is a congregation of believers who collectively make up the Kingdom where God rules.
2. The local churches networked to impact the world by
a. Sending out mission teams
b. Meeting needs of famine affected areas
c. Supporting struggling churches
d. Interchanging workers
e. Collecting cooperative monies for ministry
f. Holding each other accountable
3. There is no real networking of churches to impact the Kingdom or community in Eastern North Carolina other than through W.M.U.
4. Over 90% of SRBA churches are plateaud or declining
5. Church members greatest concerns are aging congregations, little interest in church programming, insignificant evangelism efforts and dealing with a changing world
6. The existing focus of SRBA is not of interest to most churches
7. Lay persons tend to be more interested in working together with other congregations than most pastors seem to be
When you step back from the above conclusions some pretty clear thought seems to jump out. At least they do to me. I think these must become guiding principles as we listen to the Spirit call us to a fresh vision and mission for the churches of eastern North Carolina.
1. We are being untrue to the New Testament model when we are not working together with our fellow churches to impact the Kingdom and Community. If this is true, and we agreed that it was, then a primary task of the Association must then be as a catalyst to engage churches in networking to impact the Kingdom and Community.
2. When churches networked in the New Testament they seemed to move in two dimensions. Impacting the Kingdom with new mission churches and impacting the community with benevolent ministries. This then would call the Association to serve as enabler for individual congregations to network together in mission and ministry projects led by ministry teams of those persons who have a passion and calling.
3. Declining or plateaud churches are in too much of a survival mode to be able to hear the call to network and cooperate. The Association must serve as intentional instrument of church revitalization.
Summing all this up, I believe that as we listen to God we can hear Him giving us a vision of what South Roanoke Baptist Association would look like if we are genuinely following His lead and it would look like “Vital Churches networking to fulfill the Great Commission” Out of that vision He is giving us the mission to “ Serve as a catalyst for Church development toward vitality and for Church involvement towards Kingdom and community impact.”
Mull over this a little while and let me know what you hear.
Phil
Here are some of the conclusions that we began to see in the first part of the listening journey.
1. None of the New Testament Churches ever worked alone, they were all part of the larger body. The local church is not the Kingdom of God, it is a congregation of believers who collectively make up the Kingdom where God rules.
2. The local churches networked to impact the world by
a. Sending out mission teams
b. Meeting needs of famine affected areas
c. Supporting struggling churches
d. Interchanging workers
e. Collecting cooperative monies for ministry
f. Holding each other accountable
3. There is no real networking of churches to impact the Kingdom or community in Eastern North Carolina other than through W.M.U.
4. Over 90% of SRBA churches are plateaud or declining
5. Church members greatest concerns are aging congregations, little interest in church programming, insignificant evangelism efforts and dealing with a changing world
6. The existing focus of SRBA is not of interest to most churches
7. Lay persons tend to be more interested in working together with other congregations than most pastors seem to be
When you step back from the above conclusions some pretty clear thought seems to jump out. At least they do to me. I think these must become guiding principles as we listen to the Spirit call us to a fresh vision and mission for the churches of eastern North Carolina.
1. We are being untrue to the New Testament model when we are not working together with our fellow churches to impact the Kingdom and Community. If this is true, and we agreed that it was, then a primary task of the Association must then be as a catalyst to engage churches in networking to impact the Kingdom and Community.
2. When churches networked in the New Testament they seemed to move in two dimensions. Impacting the Kingdom with new mission churches and impacting the community with benevolent ministries. This then would call the Association to serve as enabler for individual congregations to network together in mission and ministry projects led by ministry teams of those persons who have a passion and calling.
3. Declining or plateaud churches are in too much of a survival mode to be able to hear the call to network and cooperate. The Association must serve as intentional instrument of church revitalization.
Summing all this up, I believe that as we listen to God we can hear Him giving us a vision of what South Roanoke Baptist Association would look like if we are genuinely following His lead and it would look like “Vital Churches networking to fulfill the Great Commission” Out of that vision He is giving us the mission to “ Serve as a catalyst for Church development toward vitality and for Church involvement towards Kingdom and community impact.”
Mull over this a little while and let me know what you hear.
Phil

